The Fleet

Powered Paragliding is awesome, of course, but options are good, too.

Boeing 737

1980 - 2007 Models 737-200, 300, 500, 700

I definitely don't own one of these but, since they pay for the others, it only seemed fair to include here.

The baby Boeing is surprisingly a lot of fun to fly, especially when it's lightly loaded. More nimble than you'd expect, its roll control is crisp and, although artificial, its feel is well balanced. Once you get used to the speeds and the control latency (where it keeps rolling a bit when input is removed) the airplane is quite conventional. 

Jeff-BlueEng1.JPG (107858 bytes)737byBertGarrison.jpg (44842 bytes)

1) Thankfully the motor's not running. Notice how they're perfectly sized to ingest human shapes. They don't come with pull starters, either.

2) A 737-300 on Approach. by Bert Garrison.

The basics are the same: more power makes you go up or go faster (take your pick) and less power lets you go down or slow down. The numbers are just different. It takes a lot longer to slow because, not only is it aerodynamically clean, but you're usually slowing from a much higher speed. Dollars roll out the tailpipes with ridiculous thrust, it's good to have 137 people helping pay the bills. 

Don't be too intimidated by the speeds, though. After all, it's more about relative position of the pointers than what it's pointing at. Zero is still pointing straight up and the bottom of the white arc still means the same thing as it does in a small plane: you'll soon go from flying to falling.

The 6000 fpm climbout on light flights is fun but don't tell my boss, we're in contract negotiations.




1956 Beechcraft Bonanaza

I've owned an airplane or share of an airplane since just after college. My first was a Cessna 150, bought for a whopping $3200 for a half-share. I flew the paint off that thing. It was certified to fly instruments and I was silly enough to do so. Frequently. I flew places and conditions where I had no business flying a Cessna 150—legal does not mean wise! By the time my partner wanted to move onto something bigger and better (and costing much more money) I was able to buy him out. For probably 15 years that airplane served Yeoman duty.

Eventually, I  outgrew the 150 and wound up in a 9-way partnership with a 4-place Cherokee Cruiser. That worked well until I moved to a residential airport. They didn't allow clubs and so the Cherokee had to relocate, leaving me with a hangar in my back yard and no airplane.

Actually, there was a Citabria (pictured left) renting the hangar but it wasn't mine. I did get checked out in the airplane, another story in itself, but alas it ended up biting the dirt (its owner was ok) anyway. That's when a neighbor and friend, Al Anderson, mentioned that he was interested in selling his Beechcraft Bonanza.

Perfect! I'd been flying the airplane occasionally and loved the way it handled. Within a week, Bubba was mine.

Since then I've added an autopilot, coupled GPS, new interior and paint. That all added up to more than the entire new purchase price but such is the price of speed. There are faster airplanes out there but not with this much room. I've packed two paramotors in there with room for wings and luggage and another body. Plus I absolutely love the handling.

BubbaBeside.jpg (100856 bytes)BubbaOccupied.jpg (102246 bytes)

1. Bubba was repainted in 2003 and sits here, awaiting flight in about 2005.

2. A full house.

3. Al Anderson, the airline pilot and airframe inspector who keeps it healthy, lands after a test flight.


1969 Enstrom F28 Helicopter, updated June 16, 2007

In 1998 I set out to realize a life-long desire: flying a helicopter. Just an introductory flight, I figured, to get it out of my system. 8 months later I was the proud owner of a 1968 Enstrom F28A Helicopter. Ooops.

It was my lifelong desire to fly low and slow but it was always too risky in airplanes and in helicopters could handle it much safer. Little did I know that within months I was going to discover the sport of powered paragliding. In a way, the timing was propitious—had I discovered PPG first, I would not likely have been motivated to buy Ellie.

The Robinson that I learned in was a great machine but was a lot more expensive and had no cargo area beyond what you could stuff under its tiny seats. The Enstrom's wide cabin became a real boon after learning to paramotor—my Fly 75 would fit inside and the wing squeezed into that cargo area. Yehaa, helicamping with PPG!

1) Arriving down the taxiway. 2) preparing. 3) Pushing over to launch. Helictopers can take off straight up but doing so leaves fewer options after an engine failure. 4) Arriving.

Photos by Tim Kaiser

Mostly I give rides, go to paramotor flying fields and scope out new places to fly PPG. Tim Kaiser and I have found numerous out-of-the-way sites right around the Naperville area that have turned into reliable launches.

In 2003 I also flew her around the Chicago area with a cameraman who was filming for the TV series "Airline." Being a private pilot in rotorcraft means I was only allowed to share expenses which essentially meant they paid only for most of the fuel (a relatively small part of the operating expense). That was fine, though, the flying was a blast. 

EllieFooFooLanding2.jpg (39064 bytes)

Chicago5.jpg (49607 bytes)

Both2.jpg (64088 bytes)

1. On approach.

2. Flying the Sears Tower, Downtown Chicago.

3. Bubba and Ellie both live in this hangar—a tight squeeze at best.

Paramotors, Wings & Jeff Goin's PPG History

This is where the most fun is. Added 2006-11-23

Apco Santana 28: In March 1999 I set out to join the sport of powered paragliding, having seen the sport's virtues extolled by Nick Scholtes, I headed for California and hopefully my P2 paraglider rating with Jeff Williams. I don't have any pictures of myself flying during this training because Jeff was too busy biting his nails every time I went airborne.

JeffOverhead1.JPG (21063 bytes)It took two trips to California to get the full training and I had a great time along the way. Jeff was patient and passionate. He was a stickler, too. The requirement was 5 consecutive forward inflations and so that's what I did. 

The Santana, pictured left, was a horrible wing to inflate in no wind. Of course I had no idea because it my first exposure to the sport. Plus, paraglider pilots rarely fly in no wind and so that's not a big deal. As I later learned, it is a huge deal for paramotoring.

Marshal.jpg (47993 bytes)Tandem5.jpg (3924 bytes)
(Left) On March 25, 1999, Jeff Williams snapped this shot of me standing atop Marshal, a soaring launch site near San Bernardino, CA. Shortly afterwards I did my first high flight in a paraglider. Exhilarating. It was this picture that I sent to my mother informing her that I'd "gone off the edge" and soloed a paraglider. She has since forgiven me. (Right) A tandem landing during my training. Strangely, I never did a tandem flight but rather did "bunny hops" to prepare. 

FLY 75:  Mark Sorenson became my first paramotor instructor when he sold me this modified Fly 70 and agreed to give me instruction with it. The motor worked perfectly for my small 150 pound frame. In spite of my best efforts to the contrary, Mark got me airborne while he worked with another instructor.

This motor has made the rounds and, amazingly, continues to serve. It's primary redeeming quality is that it fits in the helicopter without disassembly. That turns out to be a handy way to get back from the helicopter shop when I need to leave it.

Paralanding3.jpg (38239 bytes)SmallSize.jpg (39594 bytes)JeffReversing.jpg (46674 bytes)
Digital cameras were just getting to the point of usefulness as this early version shows. Pardon the picture quality.

Sky Cruiser Top 80: At my first PPG event, 1999's Albuquerque Balloon Fiesta Fly-In, I saw the Miniplane. I picked it up and heard it fly. Lightweight and powerful but quiet, too. Cool, I thought, but there were only a couple in the country. I didn't want to be an early adopter and meet with potential maintenance headaches. 

Then, in the spring of 2000, Francesco DeSantis and Jim Jackson were showing their new Sky Cruisers off at a Florida show. They used the same gas-sipping Top 80 motor, were more transportable and promised to have good support.

A few months later, on a trip to Florida, Check let me take one out for a test drive.

To try it was to fall in love with it. After one flight I put my order in and in about May of 2000 I took delivery. One of it's maiden voyages became fodder for a favorite story—the "Eager Beaver" prop. I still have that prop. Eventually I'll get the story up here on Footflyer.

It had a flexible cage and no weight shift, that would have to weight for a number of years. It required a technique of inflating the wing before powering up but that wasn't too hard to master. I've since discovered that you can power up early but don't do so with big wings or great vigor lest the cage flex into the prop.

Jeff+Cruiser.jpg (125357 bytes)
Digital cameras had improved, too, thus the better quality. I was preparing to launch from this field with my new Sky Cruiser. I'd just taken delivery.

Arcus 28: In late 2000 I wanted to get an easier-to-inflate soaring wing that would also be good for motoring. After trying several, I settled on the Swing Arcus. It was large and slow but had a low sink rate, decent handling and was far easier to launch with no wind than the Santana.

It had no trimmers, a staple of modern motor wings, but would accelerate nicely with speedbar. That made it a good soaring wing but make sure to hook up that speed bar. The speed range went from real slow to slow otherwise.

I had a parachutal stall with this wing while flying in mid-afternoon conditions during the summer of 2000 in spite of minimal brake pressure. That was an eye-opener as my paraglider training suggested that parachutal stall was largely a thing of past technology. Not so fast. After reporting the event on a newsgroup I discovered that numerous other PPG pilots had experienced the same thing. They recounted their own episodes (privately) and it became clear that training standards needed modification. It  was the seminal event that motivated me to start working on "Risk & Reward."

This sized Arcus would be a good wing for a heavier pilot so I sold it to a friend who weighed about 30 pounds more than me.

JeffFly5.jpg (34424 bytes)
This picture of an Arcus flying along the beach at Coats Cliff, Baja, Mexico formed the basis of the USPPA logo.

Silex: Sometime in 2001 I tried the Fresh Breeze Silex wing. I'd flown a number of wings up to that point and they were all fine creations, universally easier to inflate than my Santana but handling was middling. The Silex changed that.

It was incredibly responsive, easy to inflate (certainly relative to the Santana) and gave up only a very small amount of efficiency. I bought one and it quickly became the only wing I wanted to fly. In 2002, when I launched the Enterprise, I bought another Silex to keep aboard so I wouldn't have to schlep a wing back and forth.

JeffOnSilexByAndyBauer.jpg (92002 bytes)
During an Enterprise trip in Florida I stopped to fly the Silex West of Orlando. Photo by Andy Bauer

Sky Cruiser Snap 100: As much as I like the Top 80, there were times I wanted more push for high altitude flying. I tried the Snap 100 in Albuquerque in 2004 and it worked quite well. It continues to serve me although I have discovered that a really good-running Top 80 puts out almost as much as thrust as the Snap. I still have, and will probably keep flying, a pair of Top 80 paramotors that put out great thrust. On the "Jeff Sea Level Thrust scale", the Snap is a 100 pound thrust machine while the Top 80 is a 95 pound thrust machine.

This particular machine is the one that went on the Baja trip with Jeff Hamann aboard his sailboat, the GloriaMaris. It worked flawlessly while being left on the beach for nearly 8 straight days.

JeffSnap100.jpg (135842 bytes)
The Sky Cruiser Snap 100 was one of the nicest looking machines but never quite lived up to its thrust promise. The Snap motor is heavier than a Top 80 by a few pounds but has only a bit more thrust. This machine has served me well, however and has never left me stranded. Photo by Jeff Hamann

Blackhawk 172: At a fall competition in 2005 I doomed myself. My just-purchased Black-Devil powered machine puked as I inflated up for the first task of the event. It wouldn't start again. I would have no way to win without the points on that day's tasks and knew it was over. 

My mistake was then taking Phil Russman up on his offer to ease my frustrated psyche with a flight on his machine, a Blackhawk. I found it very comfortable, more so than my previous models in spite of its left-handed throttle. So I took up Bob Armond on an offer to trade my machine (which I got running by then) for the Blackhawk. It has turned out to be a good trade.

The unit now lives on the Enterprise and has carried me aloft on many high-altitude missions. At 145 pounds I don't really need the power for most flying but it sure is nice in thin air. I'll admit that it's kind of nice even down low.

I wanted the Black Devil power for my frequent high-elevation flights and competition. In competition, the steepness of your turn is significantly related to thrust, especially in thin air. Without enough thrust, you have to shallow the bank lest the ground rise and and smite thee.

Blackhawk172byTimKaiser.jpg (101066 bytes)
Paratoys Blackhawk 172. Photo by Tim Kaiser

Spice 22: I'd heard Alex Varv talk about the handling of this new prototype wing and was intrigued. It supposedly had spry turning along with high efficiency. Alex brought over a demo, at the time called a Manta and I wound up falling in love with it. By this time I'd flown dozens of other wings including several DHV 2-3 models and an aerobatic model. But non fit the desires of my flying like the Spice. I didn't need to go super fast and I didn't want to require lots of thrust. In a nutshell, I wanted handling and efficiency.

I have yet to fly a wing with handling as sporty as this. During a back-to-back comparison flight with my Silex, the Spice required 400 less RPM while flying with the Fly 75 (yes, I still fly this motor occasionally).

The Spice's efficiency also allows it be soared although its small size means that it will take more lift than a normally sized soaring wing.

It not for the faint-hearted. It's twitchy in flight, requires more effort to keep in place and is more prone to collapses at high speed than some other wings. Even worse though, the extremely sensitive handling has caused a number of crashes just from over-controlling. So, like all things in life, especially aviation, there are trade-offs.

MantaAlex500.jpg (54905 bytes)
Alex Varv Kites the Manta which became the Spice.

Hang Glider Trike

2000 Cosmos Samba with Topless Hang Glider wing

Hang gliding was one of the first things I wanted to do, right along with soaring, but my parents (probably wisely) kept me away. Well after leaving the nest, though, my curiosity came back and HG trikes looked like little aerial go carts. I was concerned with the controls all being backwards and warned my instructor that I'd me more difficult than most.

Fortunately, the training went well and, even after a scary first solo, I really liked it. Harry Rosset and I went in together to buy a small, very efficient single-seater, the Cosmos Samba. It uses a regular high-performance hang glider wing that was used for unpowered hang gliding competition. That made it a bit slippery but, with all the cart's drag, it wasn't that difficult to fly or manage glide.

It's got the same engine I've seen used on a few older paramotors, the Zenoah 250 cc but its power aplenty on this platform. especially since it's really designed as a soaring trike. These are sometimes called Nanolights. But then, by that measure, what the heck would you calla 45 pound Top 80 paramotor?

Ironically, the fellow who soloed me in his mammothly powerful tandem unit, was the same instructor who took me up on a towed hang glider introductory flight 10 years earlier. He was a gem then and again for this training. God bless his patient, understanding demeanor. Treasure that if you can find it and enjoy your training. You certainly will.

It climbs my 150 lbs carcass at nearly 300 fpm and my friend's 200 pounds at probably 250 fpm. With a 3 gallon fuel tank it can go for at least a couple hours. Handling is awesome compared with the tandem. More slippery and with a delay that takes a some acquaintance, but overall well balanced. It turns to the left (even unpowered) and we can't figure out how to fix that but will eventually get it to someone who really knows what they're doing.

Jeff Samba 03 by Jeff Neilson_a.jpg (92018 bytes)

Jeff Samba 03 by Jeff Neilsonb.jpg (90020 bytes)

Flying the Samba at Harryport in Northern Illinois. Photos by Dr. Jeff Neilsen.



© 2016 Jeff Goin & Tim Kaiser   Remember: If there's air there, it should be flown in!